Predictors of Poor Participation in Mammographic Breast Cancer Screening among Women in Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria

AN Mbaba, MP Ogolodom, N Alazigha, R Abam, BU Maduka, ID Jaja, DC Ugwuanyi, VK Nwodo, and AC Okwor

Published Date: 2021-04-20

AN Mbaba1, MP Ogolodom2*, N Alazigha1, R Abam1, BU Maduka3, ID Jaja4, DC Ugwuanyi5, VK Nwodo5, and AC Okwor6

1Department of Radiology, Rivers State University Teaching Hospital, Port Harcourt Rivers State, Nigeria

2X-ray Department, Zonal Hospital Ahoada, Rivers State, Nigeria

3Department of Medical Radiography and Radiological Sciences, University of Nigeria Enugu Campus, Nigeria

4Department of Community Medicine, Rivers State University, Nkpolu-Oroworukwo, Port Harcourt, Nigeria

5Department of Radiography and Radiological Sciences, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nnewi Campus, Awka Anambra State, Nigeria

6Department of Radiology, Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki, Ebony State, Nigeria

Corresponding Author:
MP Ogolodom
Department of X-ray, Zonal Hospital Ahoada
Rivers State, Nigeria
E-mail: mpos2007@yahoo.com

Received: March 15, 2021; Accepted: March 30, 2021; Published: April 08, 2021

Citation:Mbaba AN, Ogolodom MP, Alazigha N, Abam R, Maduka BU, et al. (2021) Predictors of Poor Participation in Mammographic Breast Cancer Screening among Women in Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria. Crit Care Obst Gyne Vol.7 No.3:28.

Visit for more related articles at Critical Care Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract

Morbidity and mortality from breast cancer can be reduced if detected early and breast cancer screening is the ultimate strategy for early diagnosis. Understanding the determinants that influence patient’s failure to embrace or participate in preventive care is a prerequisite for strategies to reverse the trend.

Objective: This study was designed to identify the predictors of poor participation in mammographic breast cancer screening in our setting to encourage women to adopt preventive health care measures.

Material and Methods: This was a questionnaire-based descriptive study whose validity was calculated using the Index of item Objective Congruence (IOC). Questionnaire administration and retrieval of responses were physically and electronically done. The entire study lasted for two months (July to August 2020).

Results: Two hundred completed questionnaires were retrieved and analyzed. The mean age of the participants was 39.3 ± 14.6 years. A larger number 60.5% (n=121) of the participants had tertiary education. With regards to the level of the participants’ awareness of breast cancer, a large proportion of 91.5% (n=183) has heard of breast cancer. The majority 67.7% (n=135) of the participants had no family history of breast cancer. A greater number 87.5% (n=175) of the participants have heard of mammography as a breast cancer screening method. Most 41.5% (n=83) of the participants have not undergone mammography examination because none was in their vicinity, followed by those that we're afraid of radiation 28.5% (n=57) and the least 19% (n=18) attributed their reason of not going for mammography to the attitude of the attendants.

Conclusion: In a resource-constrained setting, factors such as education, household income, availability, and affordability of breast cancer screening services are important predictors of participation in breast cancer screening exercises as documented in this study.


 

Keywords

Breast cancer; Participation; Predictors; Screening

Introduction

Breast cancer is a major malignancy found in women, accounting for 19% of all cancers and the second most common cause of death among them globally [1,2]. In 2015, about 2.4 million new cases of breast cancer were diagnosed and 523,000 deaths were documented worldwide [3]. There is a steady rise in the incidence of breast cancer in sub-Saharan African [4], and in Nigeria, evidence from two cancer registries demonstrate that the incidence rate of female breast cancer per 100,000 has increased from 24.7% in 1999 to 54.3% in 2012 [5,6]. The peak age of breast cancer in Nigerian women is about a decade earlier than that of Caucasians [7,8] and some cases have even been reported among women aged below 30 years [9]. Breast cancer patients, in Africa, often present with advanced stages of the disease than their western counterparts with a concomitant increase in mortality rate [10]. In Nigeria, about 70% of these patients present late when no known remedy can reverse disease progression.

Evidence has shown that morbidity and mortality from breast cancer can be reduced if detected early and breast cancer screening is the ultimate strategy for early diagnosis [11,12]. The established methods of breast cancer screening include Breast Self-Examination (BSE), clinical breast examination, and mammography each with its advantages and disadvantages [13]. In developed countries, more than 50 percent of eligible women participate in breast screening [14]. In developing countries, there is poor knowledge of breast cancer screening among women and consequently, do not engage in the screening practices. Factors militating against breast cancer screening practices according to some studies include inadequate knowledge or awareness of screening services, family income, culture, and levels of education of participants [15,16].

Screening mammography has not gained popularity in Nigeria [17-19], and the incidence of breast cancer is rising in our environment, necessitating the need for early detection as this would increase the treatment options available to affected women and improve outcomes [20]. A study in Nigeria, documented the value of screening mammography even in asymptomatic women with a call on the women to engage in breast screening practices [21]. The decline in breast cancer deaths in Western climes in recent times has been attributed partly to early presentation and diagnosis through breast cancer screening services [22]. It is common knowledge that preventive care measures have effectively reduced morbidity and mortality from breast cancer and understanding the determinants that influence patient’s failure to embrace or participate in preventive health care services are prerequisites for strategies to reverse the trend [23]. It is possible that the women of this region may have different trends and health-seeking behavioral patterns when compared to the general women population of this country. In this study, we aimed to identify the predictors of poor participation of mammographic breast cancer screening in our setting to encourage our women to adopt preventive health care, particularly as regards breast cancer screening.

Methods

This was a questionnaire-based descriptive study carried out among women in Port Harcourt Metropolis, Rivers State, South- South, Nigeria. The questionnaire used in this study was designed by the authors, While the validity of the questionnaire was calculated using the index of Item Objective Congruence (IOC) as used by previous researchers [24,25].The content validity of the questionnaire was determined by calculating the index of Item Objective Congruence (IOC). According to the index parameters, an IOC score >0.6 was assumed to show good content validity. All the scores obtained in this study for all the items of the questionnaire after IOC interpretation were >0.6.

The questionnaire consisted of two sections. The first section was made up of three questions on the participants’ sociodemographic variables such as age, educational status, and occupation. The second section, which consisted of 15 questions, evaluated the participants’ awareness of breast cancer, breast cancer screening methods, determinants of partaking in breast cancer screening, and the ways to encourage women to embrace breast cancer screening. We employed both paper and online versions of the questionnaire in this study. The online version, which was designed using Enketo Express for Kobo Toolbox, was used to obtain information from the participants with whom we could not come in contact. The link of the online version of the questionnaire was distributed to the participants through email addresses and WhatsApp platforms where they had access to fill the questionnaire, while the paper version was administered to the participants using one on one method. The completed paper questionnaires were manually retrieved immediately while the responses from the online version were retrieved electronically. The entire study lasted for two months (July to August 2020).

The aim of the study was clearly stated in the questionnaire and the participant’s consents were properly sought before they were recruited into the study. All participants’ information was treated with a high level of confidentiality. The participants were instructed to fill the questionnaire just once to avoid duplication of data and their participation in this study was voluntary. Data generated in this study were collected using a data spreadsheet and processed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21. The processed data were analyzed using descriptive statistics such as table, mean, standard deviations, and bar chart.

Results

Two hundred completed questionnaires were retrieved and analyzed. The mean age of the participants was 39.3 ± 14.6 years with the majority 41.5% (n=83) within the age group of 41-50 years old. A larger number 60.5% (n=121) of the participants had tertiary education and the least 2% (n=4) had no formal education. A good number 42% (n=84) of the participants were civil servants, followed by professionals 36.5% (n=73). Among the professionals, nurses were highest in number 10% (n=20), followed by doctors 9% (n=18) and the least 3.5% (n=7) were radiographers (Table 1).

S/N VARIABLE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE (%)
a) Age group
  <20 years 8 4.0
  20-30 years 18 9.0
  31 - 40 years 37 18.5
  41- 50 years 83 41.5
  51 years and above 54 27.0
  Total 200 100
b) Educational Status
  Primary 19 9.5
  Secondary 56 28
  Tertiary 121 60.5
  None 4 2.0
  Total 200 100
c) Occupation
  Artisan 10 5.0
  Petty Tractors 33 16.5
  Civil Servant 84 42.0
  Professional 73  
  Accountant 2 1.0
  Primary Health care workers 16 8.0
  Nurses 20 10
  Radiographers 7 3.5
  Doctors 18 9
  Teachers 10 5
  Total 200 100

TABLE 1: Socio-demographic variables of the participants.

With regards to the level of the participants’ awareness of breast cancer, a large proportion of 91.5% (n=183) have heard of breast cancer. The majority 67.7% (n=135) of the participants had no family history of breast cancer and the least 6% (n=12) had a family history of breast cancer. Most of the participants 81.5% (n=163) perceived breast cancer as a deadly disease that can be treated if detected early and 11.5% (n=23) of the participants had no idea about what breast cancer was (Table 2).

S/N QUESTIONS FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE (%)
1) Have you heard of breast cancer?
  Yes 183 91.5
  No 17 8.5
  Total 200 100
2) Is there any history of breast cancer in your family
  Yes 12 6.0
  No 135 67.5
  Don’t know 53 26.5
  Total 200 100
3) What do you know about breast cancer?
  Simple disease like malaria 0 -
  A deadly disease that can be treated if detected early 163 81.5
  A deadly disease that cannot be treated 14 7.0
  A disease caused by witchcraft 0 -
  Don’t know anything about the disease 23 11.5
  Total 200 100

Table 2: Frequency and percentage distribution of participant’s level of awareness of breast cancer.

The result of the participant’s awareness level of breast cancer screening revealed that out of 200 participants 86.5% (n=173) were aware of breast cancer screening. The majority 54% (n=128) of the participants knew about Self Breast Examination (SBE) as a breast cancer screening method, followed by those that know about mammography 23.5% (n=47). A large number 83.5% (n=167) of the participants practice at least one of the methods of breast cancer screening (Table 3).Out of 33 participants that do not practice any of the breast cancer screening method, 30.3% (n=10) perceived fear of results as their reasons, followed by those that don’t know where to go for the screening 24.25% (n=8) and the least were religious belief and culture, which is 6.06% (n=2) each (Table 3). A greater number 87.5% (n=175) of the participants had heard of mammography as a breast cancer screening method. Most 41.5% (n=83) of the participants, did not go for mammography examination because none was in their vicinity, followed by those that we're afraid of radiation 28.5% (n=57) and the least 19% (n=18) attributed their reason of not going for mammography to the attitude of the attendants. Out of 200 participants, 68.5% (n=137) practiced Self breast examination. Among those that do not practice Self-breast examination, majority 61.9% (n=39) of the participants don’t know how to do it (Table 3).

S/N QUESTIONS FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE (%)
1 Are you aware of breast cancer screening
  Yes 173 86.5
  No 27 13.5
  Total   100
2 Which methods of breast cancer screening do you know?
  Self-examination 108 54
  Clinical breast examination 27 13.5
  Mammography 47 23.5
  All methods 18 9.0
  Total 200 100
3) Are you practicing any of the methods?
  Yes 167  83.5
  No 33 16.5
  Total 200 100
4) If No to question 3 above, what are you reasons?
  Household income 64 12.12
  Salary not enough and can’t afford the cost of the test 17 21.21
  Fear of results 10 30.30
  Culture 2 6.06
  Religious Belief 2 6.06
  Don’t know where to go 6 24.25
  Not interested    
  Total 33 100
5) Have you heard of mammography as a method of breast cancer screening?
  Yes 175 87.5
  No 25 12.5
  Total 200 100
6) What will make you not to go for mammography?
  Fear of radiation 57 28.5
  Not in your varianity 83 41.5
  Fear of pain of compression 22 11.0
  Attitude of the attendants 18 9.0
  The cost of the test 20 10
  Total 200 100
7) Breast self-examination does not attract any cost, do you practice it?
  Yes 137 68.5
  No 63 31.5
  Total 200 100
8) If no to question 9 above, what are you reasons?
  Don’t know how to do it 39 61.90
  Know how to do it but don’t like doing it 24 38.1
  Total 63 100

Table 3: Participant’s awareness level of breast cancer screening.

Greater number 26.5% (n=53) of the participants don’t know where to go for breast cancer screening followed by those that said that there is a need to create more awareness on breast cancer screening 21.5% (n=43) and the least 6% (n=12) said that they did not need breast cancer screening (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Frequency/percentage distribution of participant’s reasons for not partaking in breast cancer screening.

A good number 34% (n=68) got information on breast cancer due to their frequent contacts with doctors and other health personnel, followed by those that got information from social media 20.5% (n=41) and the least 8% (n=16) got information from radio jingles (Figure 2).

Figure 2: Frequency/Percentage distribution of participant’s source of information on breast cancer.

Participants’ suggestions on how to encourage them to embrace breast cancer screening were evaluated and the results revealed that out of 200 participants, 57% (n=102) agreed that breast cancer screening should be free, followed by those that strongly agreed 29% (n=58) and the least strongly disagreed 6% (n=12). The majority 57% (n=114) agreed that more screening centers should be established. Most of the participants 59.5% (n=119) strongly agreed that effort should be made at increasing awareness (Table 4).

S/N QUESTIONS FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE (%)
1) What do you think should done to encourage women to embrace breast cancer screening
A) It should be free - -
a. Strongly disagree 12 6%
b. Disagree 13 6.5%
c. Somewhat disagree 15 7.5%
d. Agree 102 51%
e. Strongly agree 58 29%
  Total 200 100%
B) More screening centres should be established
a. Strongly disagree 1 0.5%
b. Disagree 0 0%
c. Somewhat disagree 3 1.5%
d. Agree 114 57%
e. Strongly agree 82 41%
  Total 200 100%
C) Effort should be made at increasing awareness
a. Strongly disagree 3 1.5%
b. Disagree 0 0%
c. Somewhat disagree 2 1.0%
d. Agree 76 38%
e. Strongly agree 119 59.5%
  Total 200 100%

Table 4: Participant’s suggestions on how to encourage them to embrace a breast cancer screening.

Discussion

The findings of this study revealed that the majority of the participants were within the 4th, 5th decades, and above with the highest number in the age range of 41-50 years. This finding is inconsistent with the findings of the studies conducted by [1, 18, 22, 26-29]. The differences in our findings could be attributed to the sample sizes used in the various studies.

More than 60% of the participants, which was the highest percentage in this study had tertiary educational status. This finding is in agreement with the findings of the studies conducted by [1,18,22,29]. Contrary to our findings on the participants' educational status, Oladimeji et al. [28], reported participants with secondary educational status to be highest. The discrepancies in our findings could be ascribed to the differences in our sample sizes.

With regards to the participants’ awareness level of breast cancer, our study revealed a high level of awareness of breast cancer among our study participants with more than 91% rating. This finding is consistent with the findings of similar studies conducted by [29-35]. In contrast to our finding, Okobia et al. [22], reported poor knowledge of participants about breast cancer. The level of awareness about breast cancer varied among the population of the different studies as they documented different absolute values of the level of awareness. The high levels of breast cancer awareness noted in our study could be ascribed to the number of participants with higher educational status.

A greater number of participants in our study got the information on breast cancer due to their contacts with doctors and other health personnel. This finding is in keeping with the findings of previous studies conducted by Eguvbe [32] and Omotara et al. [36]. In contrast to our findings, other authors reported different sources of information on breast cancer in their studies. Salaudeen et al. [37] and Bello et al. [30], reported television, Irurhe [38], reported textbooks, Omotara et al. [36], reported friends. The sources of information about breast cancer differ among the population and the differences could be ascribed to the difference in the sample sizes used in the various studies and the geographical variations of the aforementioned studies.

This study revealed that most of the participants had no family history of breast cancer. This finding is similar to the finding of the study carried out by Amoran and Toyobo [1] in Nigeria among women of reproductive age group in a rural town.

Over 80% of the participants in this study perceived breast cancer as a deadly disease that can be treated if detected early. This finding is in keeping with the finding of the research work done by Younis et al. [29]. In contrast, was the finding of the study conducted by Okobia et al. [22], in which a greater number of their participants perceived breast cancer to be non-curable even when detected early. The identified discrepancies in our findings could be ascribed to a difference in the sample sizes, nature of studies, and geographical locations of the studies.

Approximately 87% of the participants in this study were aware of breast cancer screening with a majority having a good knowledge of BSE. Our finding is similar to the findings of the studies carried out by Amoran and Toyobo [1] and Foluso and Noela [27] all in southwestern Nigeria.

With regards to the participants’ practice of any breast cancer screening method, the majority of the participants in our study carried out any form of breast cancer screening. This finding is in agreement with the findings of the studies conducted by Kordan-Souraki et al. [26] in the Northern part of Iran. However, studies conducted by Oladimeji et al. [28], in Ibadan, Oyo State, Western Nigeria, Amoran and Toyobo [1] in Ogun State, Western Nigeria, Ojewusi et al. [39], Balogun and Owoaje [40], among market women, were inconsistent with the results of this study. The discrepancies in our findings could be attributed to the various study population, sample sizes, and geographical variation among the participants who did not practice any of the methods of breast cancer screening, the majority attributed their reasons to fear of results, followed by those that don’t know where to go for the screening. Other reasons, which were also stated include need extra-awareness, non-affordability and accessibility, need financial support, time, haven’t had the need, and feel no symptoms. The reasons for participants not practicing any method of breast cancer screening varied among various studies, but the common ones were lack of knowledge on how to perform breast self-examination [1,28], fear of finding a lump [31,41], no symptoms [35,36], lack of awareness [22]. Others felt they were violating their bodies by palpating their breasts [35,41,42] not considering it necessary [35,41]. The variations in our participants' reasons for not participating in any breast cancer screening technique could be ascribed to the different populations studied.

The greater population of the participants in our study was aware of mammography as a breast cancer screening method. This finding is consistent with the findings of previous studies conducted by Akhigbe and Omuemu [43] and Ojewusi et al. [39]. Most of the participants that have heard of mammography did not go for mammography examination because none was found in their vicinity, fear of radiation, household income, fear of the result, an attitude of the attendants, and cost of the test. Similar studies were conducted by Obajimi et al. [18] Younis et al. [29], Kardan-Souraki et al.[26]Younis et al. [29] reported a lack of time and that their participants did not believe they were at risk. The participants knew there was a risk in undergoing mammography investigation Obajimi et al. [18] and household income was related to breast cancer screening Kardan-Souraki et al. [26]. The reported reasons vary depending on the nature of the studies and the geographical locations. According to Kardan-Souraki et al. [26] study conducted in Iran, women with high household incomes had a high rate of screening. Due to the aforementioned reasons and its implications on the practice of mammography breast cancer screening, the Korean government provides free screening services to low-income people [44]. Creating more awareness on mammography screening techniques and the Nigerian government making the mammography screening services free in our locality will increase the rate of mammography breast cancer screening which will invariably reduce the rate of breast cancer morbidity and mortality.

A large number of the participants agreed that making mammography investigation free will encourage more women to be actively involved in breast cancer screening exercises. This finding is in line with the ideology of the Korean government, in which breast cancer screening was made free especially for low-income people [44]. The establishment of several breast cancer screening centers will enable more women to partake in mammography investigation.

Conclusion

In a resource-constrained setting, factors such as education, household income, availability, and affordability of breast cancer screening services are important predictors of participation in mammographic breast cancer screening as documented in this study. Breast cancer screening campaigns aimed at bridging the knowledge gaps in breast cancer awareness should be promoted among the general population, especially among illiterate women and those with lower education. There is a need for the establishment of more breast cancer screening centers as well as designing and implementing organized breast cancer screening programs.

Funding/Conflicts of Interests

We report no funding assistance or conflicts of interest.

References

open access journals, open access scientific research publisher, open access publisher
Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language

Viewing options

Flyer image

Share This Article

paper.io

agar io

wowcappadocia.com
cappadocia-hotels.com
caruscappadocia.com
brothersballoon.com
balloon-rides.net

wormax io